Use of Mixed Methods in Studying Resilience.

In this article, we will discuss Why do Researchers recommend the Use of Mixed Methods in Studying Resilience?

Use of Mixed Methods in Studying Resilience.

Researchers recommend the Use of Mixed Methods in studying resilience because resilience is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon that cannot be fully captured by a single method or approach. Resilience involves various factors such as individual, social, cultural, and environmental, which interact in complex ways to promote adaptation and positive outcomes in the face of adversity.

Quantitative methods, such as surveys and standardized tests, provide valuable information on the prevalence, frequency, and severity of adversity and protective factors, as well as their relationships with different outcomes. However, these methods often lack depth and richness in capturing the subjective experiences, meanings, and contexts of resilience.

Read Also:

Describe Risk and Protective Factors in Resilience.

Why is Resilience described as ‘Domain-Specific’? Illustrate with the help of an example.

Do you agree that Resilience is ‘Ordinary Magic’? Provide examples in support of your answer.

Cite an Example of Apparent Resilience that might have been observed in life or in people around.

If you are asked to develop a resilience intervention on college students in India, which risk and protective factors will you focus on?

Provide a description of some of the Multiple Systems and Protective Factors that can Contribute to Resilience among Individuals diagnosed with a Chronic Physical Illness.

Qualitative methods, such as interviews, focus groups, and case studies, provide in-depth and detailed information on the subjective experiences, meanings, and contexts of resilience, as well as the diversity and complexity of resilience across different domains and cultures. However, these methods often lack generalizability and reliability due to the small and selective samples and the subjective interpretations and biases of the researchers.

Therefore, the use of mixed methods, which combines quantitative and qualitative methods, can provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of resilience by triangulating different sources and types of data and by addressing the limitations and biases of each method. Mixed methods can help to identify the common and unique features of resilience across different contexts and populations, as well as the underlying mechanisms and processes that promote resilience.

Follow us:

If you like this article, you can Follow us on Facebook.
Also, you can Join our Official Facebook Group for QnA Sessions and Discussions with the worldwide IGNOU community.

Leave a Reply